Building Charging Hubs For Tesla, IONNA And EVgo: Inside Osborne’s Work

TL;DR

Buying for a business?Offer from Amazon

Get business pricing on garage and car supplies

• Business-only prices and quantity discounts
• Tax-exempt purchasing
• Multiple users, one account, clear invoices

Create a free Business account →Free to register

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.Hide

Kansas-based commercial contractor Osborne says it has built about 1,000 EV charging locations over the past decade, including sites for Tesla, IONNA, EVgo and Electrify America. CEO Stephen Osborne describes how site design, equipment changes and construction coordination affect charging hub projects, but the report does not provide project-by-project figures or independent performance data.

Commercial contractor Osborne says it has built about 1,000 EV charging locations in the past decade, working on projects for Tesla, IONNA, EVgo and other charging providers. In an interview published October 16 by Charged EVs, CEO Stephen Osborne described the construction work behind charging hubs and how evolving equipment can change their layout, cost and installation needs.

Osborne, a Kansas-based commercial construction company operating since 1976, entered the EV charging field about 10 years ago, according to Stephen Osborne. He said the company worked on early Tesla and Electrify America sites and now serves both charging networks and fleet customers. Other organizations he named include IONNA, EVgo, Francis Energy and ABB. The report does not list the locations or contract values for those projects.

Osborne said the company focuses on enterprise clients with multi-site programs. For a customer planning 100 projects, he said, Osborne typically aims to take on 30% to 50%. The company also works on bus charging depots. Osborne cited a recently activated depot for the Transit Authority of River City, serving the Louisville, Kentucky, area, where the contractor renovated a century-old building, made structural repairs and installed ChargePoint systems.

In discussing charging-site construction, Osborne said newer all-in-one charging systems can reduce the amount of equipment spread around a site, though he cautioned that the effect depends on the location and its intended use. He compared a Georgia site with 12 chargers that had occupied nearly an acre with a potential footprint of about 2,000 square feet using newer equipment. That was an illustrative comparison from the interview, not a reported measurement from a completed redesign. Smaller sites can also constrain the room crews need for machinery and construction work.

The Contractor Behind Charging Hubs

Charging networks and turnkey infrastructure providers may manage customer relationships, equipment and operations, but they still rely on construction firms to prepare sites and install systems. Osborne’s account highlights a less visible part of expanding public and fleet charging: civil work, electrical installation and coordination must come together before a charger can serve drivers.

Construction choices can affect where charging is practical. A smaller equipment footprint may make a site easier to fit into an existing parking area, while underground wiring, utility connections, building condition and access for machinery still shape the work. For drivers and fleet operators, these factors can influence where chargers are built and how quickly a project moves from plans to operation. The interview describes the contractor’s perspective; it does not independently establish that particular sites opened faster or cost less because of Osborne’s approach.

How Charging Projects Get Built

The Charged EVs report frames general contractors as a necessary part of an industry that includes charger manufacturers, software firms, utilities, charging-point operators and charging-as-a-service providers. A CaaS provider can design a project and coordinate installation, but that does not mean its own staff perform every construction task. Charging networks also commonly use contractors rather than carrying out all site work in-house.

Osborne said its model is to act as the general contractor, coordinating construction scopes rather than relying only on a local electrician. He argued that dividing work among multiple parties can create disagreements over responsibility and change orders when problems arise. Those comments reflect the company’s stated rationale for its model, not a comparative study of contractors or project outcomes.

Osborne also described changes in equipment and charging technology. He said the industry had changed more in the preceding 18 months than in the prior seven or eight years, citing higher charging speeds, battery backup systems, charger conversions and improved energy efficiency. He reported that newer systems can reach as much as 98% efficiency, while some legacy systems lose about 20% of energy. The interview does not identify the systems tested, measurement methods or independent source for those figures, so they should be understood as Osborne’s account rather than a general benchmark.

“We’ve put in something like a thousand locations in the last 10 years.”

— Stephen Osborne, CEO of Osborne, speaking to Charged EVs

Project Counts and Costs Remain Unspecified

The interview does not give a list of Osborne’s charging sites, dates for individual projects, total construction spending or a breakdown of work for Tesla, IONNA and EVgo. Its estimate of about 1,000 locations is attributed to the CEO, and the report does not describe how the count was compiled. It also does not independently verify the efficiency figures or provide a consistent method for comparing site footprints.

Osborne said IONNA is building convenience stores and that the company is doing electrical installation and site work for it. The supplied interview excerpt ends during this discussion, leaving further detail about that arrangement unavailable. It is also unclear which of the named networks have current projects under construction, how many sites are planned, and whether the examples reflect typical costs or timelines.

Further IONNA Work Details Await

The report gives no upcoming opening dates, construction milestones or future project totals for Osborne’s work with the named charging providers. The immediate next step for readers seeking more detail would be additional disclosures from Osborne or its customers about specific sites, schedules and contract scopes. Until those are available, the company’s interview provides a view of its role and reported experience, but not a project-by-project account of the charging hubs it is building.

Key Questions

Which EV charging providers has Osborne worked with?

CEO Stephen Osborne named Tesla, IONNA, EVgo, Electrify America, Francis Energy and ABB. The interview does not provide a full project list or say how many sites Osborne built for each organization.

How many EV charging locations does Osborne say it has built?

Osborne said it had completed something like 1,000 locations over about 10 years. That figure is the CEO’s estimate in the interview; no site-by-site accounting is provided.

What did Osborne do at the Louisville-area bus depot?

Osborne said it renovated a depot for the Transit Authority of River City, repaired the structure of a building about 100 years old and installed ChargePoint charging systems. The interview does not give the depot’s charger count or capacity.

Do all-in-one chargers always reduce a site’s size?

No. Osborne said they can typically help reduce a site’s footprint, but stressed that the result depends on the location and intended use. Crews still need space for equipment and construction machinery.

Are specific new charging hub openings confirmed?

The report does not provide future opening dates or identify a schedule for projects with Tesla, IONNA or EVgo. It describes Osborne’s work and examples, rather than announcing a new site launch.

Source: rss